@gilburns commented on GitHub:
I like the idea. The current Installomator repo becomes just the script and logic. The labels then become a separately maintained repo.
The main Installomator…
@mrwizard05 commented on GitHub:
I love this idea! I was just talking with a colleague about how something like this should be considered
@acodega commented on GitHub:
The file update step is the hardest part. How do we maintain the security of that update? Think about how we verify a pkg is signed and notarized.
How do we verify…
@jschwager commented on GitHub:
My only other thought to this approach would be that there should be some functionality baked in to allow folks to use their own repo if desired for the label…
@MrSuaz commented on GitHub:
I ran into this same issue. Just go into the script, find the label, update the TeamID to Match. The script will match up and install the app just fine.
@TomBoehm commented on GitHub:
I like the idea! And if we had a local folder path containing label files, we could apply additional local changes to override the Installomator default labels.
@WeDiggITSupportTeam commented on GitHub:
I am experiencing this issue as well. Is there a way to change the Developer ID in the script?
@kai-h commented on GitHub:
Yes, it's a pretty easy change - I just wanted to flag this so it gets updated in the next release. If you're deploying Installomator via an automated method that…
@kai-h commented on GitHub:
I am experiencing this issue as well. Is there a way to change the Developer ID in the script?
Yes, if you look at my comment directly above yours there are two…
@acodega commented on GitHub:
Okay I see what you mean. The admin distributes those managed labels themselves. Like via MDM. I was thinking of something similar the other day.
To be honest I…
@ReArmedHalo commented on GitHub:
I think this would be a fantastic idea! We use installomator heavily and have had to create several "override" labels in the installomator script in Jamf to…
@acodega commented on GitHub:
@TomBoehm I'm not referring to trusting the download links inside of Installomator. What I mean is how do you verify that the labels you've downloaded is a complete…
@gilburns commented on GitHub:
Fleshing out my suggestions above a bit more... The only thing that would ever be "live" downloaded would be the signed Installomator labels pkg. That can be…
@TomBoehm commented on GitHub:
@acodega You are right. The hardest part is to trust all those download links. To be notarized just states that there is no malware in the Installomator script itself.
@abstertee commented on GitHub:
I agree with all the above points and would love to see a new repo or just a separate file that can be downloaded like what has been mentioned. Happy to help…
@gilburns commented on GitHub:
Maybe the above PR will never make it into the code, but I feel it has merit to consider it.
Even if you don't want to completely separate the labels from the…